Three stages. One complete pipeline.

Every candidate moves through the same three-stage pipeline: CV scoring, a live video screening, and a digital footprint check, each one explained with the evidence behind it. The shortlist is ready. The decision is still yours.

How Lumi delivers, end to end.

Click through the pipeline to see exactly what Lumi does at each step.

CV ASSESSMENT · LIVE

Candidate	Duration	Status
Mark Evans	-	In Progress 42% Completed
Dane Kostic	-	In Progress 35% Completed
Emily Johnson	-	In Progress 55% Completed
Angela Beacham	-	In Progress 72% Completed
Thomas Reid	-	In Progress 48% Completed

Assessed against 15,000 signals

Dane Kostic Recommended Bias Check Complete

In Brief Lumi Lens

Relevant marketing graduate with First-Class academic performance, clear strengths in digital content, campaign execution, copywriting, social media, community growth, and entrepreneurial ownership. Evidence is thinner for formal reporting, research methods, content calendars, recurring multi-platform scheduling, email marketing, and structured team experience.

Score distribution

Stated specifically Claimed, thin detail Not mentioned

Marketing-related degree qualification

8.2/10 19%

Marketing campaign delivery

8.3/10 19%

Digital content creation

8.6/10 18%

Social media scheduling and publishing

7.1/10 11%

Market and competitor research

6.4/10 11%

Campaign and social performance reporting

6.9/10 11%

Marketing coordination and documentation

4.3/10 11%

Verify before offer

Compliance and factual checks to complete before making an offer.

Standing checks

Right to work / work authorisation — Not captured — check at application or offer. Standard compliance step — verify documentation at offer.

From this candidate's claims

Factual claims to check externally — references, documents, certificates.

Marketing-related degree qualification — claimed after the CV stage; verify before offer.

Assessment
Comparison

0.0 /10

Score 0.0/10

Total Assessments 35

Percentile 0%

Group Top Quarter

3

0-25%

12

26-50%

11

51-75%

9

76-100%

Explanation

This candidate scored 7.4 out of 10, placing them in the Top Quarter group. They scored higher than or equal to 96% of other candidates assessed for this role. Out of 35 total assessments, 3 scored in the bottom quarter.

Candidate Info

View CV

**********@*****.*** +44 **** ****** ******************, UK

Key attributes matched

Digital content creationCampaign planningCopywritingSocial media schedulingCommunity growthMarket researchAnalytics reportingContent calendars

Enhanced Assessment: Dane Kostic Analysis completed

5.9 /10

Start: 10 Mar 2026 10:56 · Finish: 11:12 · Duration: 16 minutes

⚠️

Integrity Concern Detected

High. Raised on Question 2: a mobile phone was visible and eye movement suggested a read-aloud answer. Flagged for human review, never an automatic rejection.

In Brief

Dane interviews well on familiar ground: he gave a detailed and well-structured account of keeping editorial and design teams aligned during his internship, and was disarmingly honest about his Excel gap. Pushed somewhere unrehearsed, planning a live event, his answers thinned to generalities and his engagement dropped. The integrity flag on Q2 means his strongest answer may not have been his own words. Watch that recording before deciding.

Q1

0:58

3.2 /10

▶ 0:58

Imagine you must organise a promotional event with limited in-person experience. How would you plan and execute it?

The session's weakest moment. A 12-second silence, then under a minute of generic “digital-first launch” talk with no venue, budget, logistics, or measure of success. When Lumi probed beyond digital channels the tone turned defensive and engagement visibly dropped. The contrast with Q2's polish is itself informative: unscripted, this candidate struggles.

Behaviour

distracted

Demeanour

defensive

Response Timing

delayed

Q2

Playing

3:05

8.3 /10

▶ 3:05

During your internship, what was the most challenging aspect of collaborating with cross-functional teams, and how did you ensure effective communication?

⚠️

High Integrity Concern: Frequent downward gazing while answering, possibly reading from a script or phone below frame. Flagged for human review, not an automatic rejection.

✓

Human review: Recording watched — a phone is visible and his eyes track line by line. Concern confirmed; the final call stays with the hiring team.

The strongest answer of the session: a specific, well-structured account of editorial and design working to mismatched deadlines and the shared weekly check-in he set up to fix it. He even covered how he got both leads to agree. On content alone this is an 8.3. But the delivery raised a flag: he gazes down frequently while answering, possibly at a script or phone used to help answer the question.

Behaviour

engaged

Demeanour

polished

Response Timing

instant

Q3

2:20

6.1 /10

▶ 2:20

On a scale of 1–5, how confident are you with the Microsoft Office Suite, and which application do you most need to improve?

Refreshingly honest. Rated himself 4/5 on Word and PowerPoint but volunteered a 2/5 on Excel unprompted, naming pivot tables and formulas as the exact gap. Most candidates claim 5s across the board. Delivery was steady with strong eye contact. The score is capped because the answer was pure self-report: nothing on the CV evidences the claimed proficiency.

Behaviour

engaged

Demeanour

candid

Response Timing

normal

Digital Footprint: Dane Kostic Analysis complete

Analysis results across social channels.

6 posts found

X Positive

Jul 1, 2026

Debating Bitcoin at Speakers' Corner

Details the author's experience engaging in public debate about Bitcoin at London's Speakers' Corner, holding a large pro-Bitcoin sign and recording interactions.

LinkedIn Positive

May 1, 2026

Improving Candidate Experience in Automated Recruitment

A professional critique of current automated recruitment tools, framing the author's work at HireWithLumi as a candidate-friendly approach.

LinkedIn Positive

Dec 10, 2025

Graduation with First-Class Honours from Bayes

Celebrates graduation with First-Class Honours from Bayes Business School, University of London, with a thesis on digital asset governance.

Instagram Positive

Jul 12, 2025

Formal Event and Social Celebration

⚠ Needs Human Review

Shown drinking directly from a bottle across several photos. Flagged for human review of the context.

Web Neutral

Jul 10, 2025

Staff Listing at The Coronet Theatre

A staff listing from The Coronet Theatre's website identifying Dane Kostic as a member of the Front of House team, confirming employment at the Notting Hill Gate venue.

TikTok Positive

Jan 11, 2024

Marketing Tips in 60 Seconds

A short-form video series sharing quick marketing tips: hooks, posting cadence and simple analytics. Confident on-camera delivery.

Candidate	Duration	Score	Status
Mark Evans	0min 12secs	6.6	Completed
Dane Kostic	0min 15secs	7.4	Completed Shortlisted
Emily Johnson	0min 17secs	4.8	Completed Email sent
Angela Beacham	0min 20secs	3.6	Completed Email sent
Thomas Reid	0min 24secs	4.3	Completed Email sent

What you get: by the time a candidate lands on your desk, you already have a full report and analysis, scored, evidenced and ready for you to schedule a human interview with.

01

Stage one

Every CV scored.
Every decision explained.

15,000 data points per candidate. Bias-checked, ranked, and ready in under 20 seconds. No overnight triage. No inconsistency between reviewers. Ready for your team to make the call.

See how CV Assessment works

02

Stage two

Automation wrote their CV.
Lumi finds out if they can do the job.

Adaptive, agentic screening generated from each candidate's own CV. Dynamic follow-ups, real-time consistency checks, integrity signals. You get a structured evidence pack per candidate, for your team to weigh, never a verdict.

See how Enhanced Assessment works

03

Stage three

Beyond the document.
Beyond the interview.

Public presence across any platforms the candidate consents to, from LinkedIn and X to Facebook, Instagram, and TikTok. Sentiment, cultural fit signals, role-fit alignment, and red flags surfaced for human review. Candidate consent required. Never auto-rejected.

See how Digital Footprint works

Three stages. One complete pipeline.

Meet Lumi.

How Lumi delivers, end to end.

Every CV scored.
Every decision explained.

Automation wrote their CV.
Lumi finds out if they can do the job.

Beyond the document.
Beyond the interview.

See it on a real role. Then decide.

Three stages. One complete pipeline.

How Lumi delivers, end to end.

Every CV scored. Every decision explained.

Automation wrote their CV. Lumi finds out if they can do the job.

Beyond the document. Beyond the interview.

See it on a real role. Then decide.

Every CV scored.
Every decision explained.

Automation wrote their CV.
Lumi finds out if they can do the job.

Beyond the document.
Beyond the interview.